The Association of Interior Specialists (AIS) is working with fellow interior sector associations, NAS (National Association of Shopfitters) and FPDC (Federation of Plastering and Drywall Contractors) to achieve clarification from the HSE on the Fee For Intervention (FFI) scheme.
The controversial scheme, which landed its first bills on contractors at the end of January, is designed to recover costs from companies caught breaking health and safety laws. However, it appears that the fit out sector is being unfairly targeted and it is not entirely justified.
Chief Executive Officer at AIS, David Frise said: “I believe it is right that those who break the law should pay their fair share of the costs to put things right but I am uncertain as to how fair the system is – what exactly constitutes a material breach serious enough for HSE to notify in writing? It appears to be highly subjective and open to the interpretation of the inspector. Realistically, if you look hard enough you are likely to find a breach of HSE regulations on most sites.”
Interim Director at FPDC, Steve Halcrow said: “Health and safety is of paramount importance on any construction site and we'd support any improvements in its implementation. However, we are concerned that the current proposals to adopt the FFI scheme could unfairly penalise specialist subcontractors. It is essential that a clear set of guidelines outlining what is required is put into action by the HSE. The HSE also needs to ensure probity as we see the need for an independent third party to monitor the scheme and ensure it is applied fairly and avoids being seen as tax to generate income.”
Director NAS, Robert Hudson said: "The corner stone of this legislation is the term ‘material breech’. How can we advise our members on a strategy of compliance when the HSE are unable to provide a definitive explanation? To the untrained eye, it would appear to be a licence to print money. The industry needs firm and friendly guidance, not the subjective judgement of an inspector looking to raise another invoice.”
